Comment on “Perhaps not everyone knows that...”,(Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 1186)
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
What Everyone Knows About Attention
If intelligent computer programs are to represent and reason about mental states and processes, a critical first step is to characterize the content to be represented. Toward that goal, I sketch an outline of a folk psychology of one important mental process, attention. The everyday knowledge people have about their own and others’ attentional processes is characterized in a number of generaliz...
متن کاملEveryone Knows That Someone Knows: Quantifiers over Epistemic Agents
Modal logic S5 is commonly viewed as an epistemic logic that captures the most basic properties of knowledge. Kripke proved a completeness theorem for the firstorder modal logic S5 with respect to a possible worlds semantics. A multiagent version of the propositional S5 as well as a version of the propositional S5 that describes properties of distributed knowledge in multiagent systems has also...
متن کاملPublication Guidelines for IEEE Transactions on Reliability, and Perhaps Everyone
I N THE HOPES of guiding authors to write better papers for our Transactions on Reliability, I’ve compiled some thoughts which I hope will help. Perhaps this will help the authors of all archival journals. An author first has to determine whether their work is of sufficient importance to warrant publication. Then if so, where should they submit the work, for whom should they write the paper, an...
متن کاملEveryone knows what is interesting : Salient locations which should
Most natural scenes are too complex to be perceived instantaneously in their entirety. Observers therefore have to select parts of them and process these parts sequentially. We study how this selection and prioritization process is performed by humans at two different levels. One is the overt attention mechanism of saccadic eye movements in a free-viewing paradigm. The second is a conscious dec...
متن کاملReason Knows Not Jennifer
There is something deeply puzzling about the idea that we can be ignorant of our own reasons. Whereas Pascal attributed certain reasons to the heart versus the mind, we may attribute such reasons to the emotional versus the cognitive mind or to the unconscious versus the conscious mind, but the central conviction remains the same: we may be moved by reasons without ever consciously thinking of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annals of Oncology
سال: 2002
ISSN: 0923-7534
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf147